Indiana University Internal Audit

Portfolio context

A university audit case study.

This project presents a hypothetical role on Indiana University’s internal audit team. The work demonstrates risk-based planning, governance awareness, audit charter analysis, engagement sequencing, control recommendations, and quality-improvement thinking. It is a portfolio showcase, not an official Indiana University audit report.

Major artifacts

What the deck demonstrates.

Risk Matrix

Weighted auditable units across reputation, financial impact, compliance, security, complexity, operational change, and prior findings.

Annual Audit Plan

Sequenced six engagements across cybersecurity, research grants, health services, athletics, payroll, and Greek life.

Audit Findings

Presented a Starbucks revenue-recognition issue with contract risk, cause analysis, and corrective recommendations.

QAIP & Recommendations

Identified improvement opportunities around ERM integration, risk coordination, commercial oversight, and cybersecurity.

Brochure artifact

Internal audit overview brochure.

Indiana University Internal Audit brochure page 1 with purpose, contact information, and overview statement

01 Purpose, contact channels, and audit overview

Indiana University Internal Audit brochure page 2 with team, process, values, mission, and perception goals

02 Team, process, values, mission, and perception

Full gallery

All 32 slides.

Slide 1: Indiana University Internal Audit title slide

01 Indiana University Internal Audit

02 Organization Overview

03 IU Operational Complexity

Slide 4: Indiana University Internal Audit Structure

04 Internal Audit Structure

05 Internal Audit Team

Slide 6: IA Recruitment and Professional Development

06 IA Recruitment and Professional Development

07 Charter Overview

08 Charter Unique Aspects

09 Proposed Charter Change

10 How We Maintain Independence

11 Committee/Initiatives

12 Academic and Student Affairs

13 Finance and Facilities

14 Governance

15 Important GIAS Principles for Governance

16 Ethics and Compliance Within IU

Slide 17: Risk Management risk factor approach

17 Risk Management Approach

Slide 18: Risk Management risk matrix table

18 Risk Management Matrix

Slide 19: Top risk Lilly Endowment Bioscience Grant

19 Top Risk: Lilly Endowment Grant

Slide 20: Top risk CFP National Championship Success

20 Top Risk: Athletics Revenue Surge

Slide 21: Top risk First Amendment and Governance Litigation

21 Top Risk: Governance Litigation

Slide 22: Assessment of Risk Management strengths

22 Risk Management Strengths

Slide 23: Assessment of Risk Management gaps and opportunities

23 Risk Management Gaps

24 Annual Audit Plan

Slide 25: Annual Audit Plan engagement timing table

25 Audit Plan Engagement Table

Slide 26: Results of Starbucks Internal Audit problem and cause

26 Starbucks Audit: Problem and Cause

Slide 27: Results of Starbucks Internal Audit risks and recommendations

27 Starbucks Audit: Risks and Recommendations

28 QAIP Strengths

29 QAIP Improvement Opportunities

Slide 30: Recommendation establish a unified ERM framework

30 Recommendation: Unified ERM Framework

Slide 31: Recommendation enhance commercial and royalty oversight

31 Recommendation: Commercial Oversight

Slide 32: Recommendation strengthen data security and cybersecurity

32 Recommendation: Cybersecurity

Important note

Portfolio showcase, not an official audit.

This page summarizes a hypothetical academic internal-audit engagement and displays rendered slide images only. The editable presentation file is not included for download.